In cases of matrimonial discords, children are the worst suffers. It is generally seen that when the separation takes place between the husband and wife, it becomes difficult for the courts to decide as to who should get the custody or the guardianship of the children. The laws governing child custody in India are the Guardians and Wards Act 1890 and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act 1956. The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act states that the ‘natural guardian of a Hindu minor, in respect of the minor’s person as well as in respect of the minor’s property …. in the case of a boy or unmarried girl- the father, and after him, the mother, provided that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother’. There are numerous connotations this can take, some of these are: that the law reflects our patriarchal social structure and that small child are always better off with the mother. Matters are also complicated by a legal process that does not view legal guardianship to be co- terminus with physical custody of a child.
However, the thumb rule is that the welfare of the child or children should be kept uppermost in the mind. It is a common thing that when the relationship between the husband and wife become irretrievably sour, they freely start blaming each other. Under the Hindu minority and Guardianship Act the mother is normally made the custodian of the children of the tender age but if she does not have the wherewithal to take proper care of the child then the right automatically passes on to the husband. Disputes between husband and wife are now rising with the very alarming rate and the sanctity of marriage is under the cloud. The continuous fights between the partners of marriage disturb the atmosphere at home and create havoc on other members of the family. In a recent case of Vivek Singh vs Romani Singh, the Supreme Court has said that although the child, a female child, in this case, has lived in the custody of father for more than six years right after when she was only 22 months old. The child, Saesha Singh, has also stated her preference to live in the family and atmosphere of her father yet the Supreme Court directed the mother to take care of the child because it is only the mother who can shape her better future.
The brief history of the case is that one Vivek Singh of Meerut married Romani Singh of New Delhi. While the husband is an army officer, the wife is a teacher in Kendriya Vidyalaya in New Delhi. They Begot a daughter Saesha Singh on 29 October 2008.On 4th August 2010, the fight between two took an ugly turn and the women left her matrimonial house thereafter the battle for the custody of the child started between the two. The girl child remained with the father. The mother then filed a case in the family court of Delhi saying that the child remains uncared and unattended at the house of her father, who goes to the office in the morning and comes back in the evening, which is not good for the mental and physical upbringing of the child. The father, on the other hand, alleged that since the mother lives with her parents in NOIDA but works in Delhi cannot look after the baby.
The Family Court after examining different facets decided that the custody of the child be given to the father. The mother then challenged the order of the family court before the High Court, which set aside the order and handed over the custody of the girl child to the mother. The father was, of course given the ‘visitation rights’. The father did not abide by the directions of the High Court and thus invited the contempt of court proceedings against himself. The father hen filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court, which stayed the contempt proceedings against the father but the Court decided to look into the matter into details for the welfare of the child. The Supreme Court engaged the principal counsellor one Ms Iti Kanungo to interact with the child, who expressed her preference to live with her father. However, the counsellor opined that considering the tender age of the child, her care and protection should be given to the mother.
The law is very clear. It says that welfare of minor to be given paramount consideration. This parameter has been adopted by the courts in almost all the cases. In a landmark judgement of Gaurav Nagpal vs Sumedha Nagpal, the Supreme Court has observed that the Guardianship act must be taken in its widest sense. The moral and ethical welfare of the child must also weigh with the court as well as the wellbeing of the child. It may be an attractive argument that the child has been living for long with the father but the court cannot overlook the significant factor of the welfare of the child. In yet another case of Rosy Jacob vs Jacob A. Chakkramakkal, the Supreme Court had said that ‘the children are not chattels nor are they mere playthings for their parents. The absolute right of parents over the destinies and lives of the children has, in the modern social condition, has yielded to the consideration of the welfare of the human beings, so that they may grow up in a normal balanced manner to be the useful member of the society.’
The Court further observed that ‘children are the most important human resources whose development has a direct impact on the development of the nation, for the child of today with suitable health, sound education and the constructive environment is the productive key member of the society. The present of the child is linked to the future of the nation, and while the children are the treasure of their parents, they are the assets who will be responsible for governing the nation’. The Supreme Court agreed with the High Court that “the role of the mother in the development of child’s personality can never be doubted. A child gets the best protection through the mother. It is the most natural thing for any child to grow up in the company of one’s mother. Neither the father nor any other person gives the same kind of love, affection, care and sympathy as that of a mother. The company of mother is more valuable to growing up a female child unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons, a child should not be deprived of the company of mother because that is always in the welfare of the minor child.”
Empirical studies have also shown that mother-infant bonding begins at the child’s birth and that infants as young as two months old frequently show signs of distress when the mother is replaced by a substitute caregiver. The primary need of the child is the care and love of its mother, where she has been its primary caregiving parent. An infant typically responds preferentially to sound of its mother’s voice by four weeks and actively demands her presence. The child protests the absence of mother from eight months and within the first year, the baby forms a profound and enduring attachment to her. The psychological theory says that the mother is centre of infants’ small world, which continues for many more years to come. The quality and strength of the original bond largely determine the child’s later capacity to fulfil the individual potential and to form an attachment to other individuals.
The marital happiness depends upon the mutual trust, respect and understanding and the home should not be an arena for ego clashes and misunderstandings. Nevertheless, when the dispute leads to the inevitable divorce between the husband and the wife, the welfare and wellbeing of the child would have to be the prime concern of the separated parents and the society at large. The court also in the first above mentioned case felt that since the mother is a teacher in the Kendriya Vidyalaya school and therefore she can get her admitted in her own school where she can keep the daughter under her full care and protection. This would also ensure better education and guidance of the mother who herself is a teacher.
Child’s Welfare is Paramount in Matrimonial Discord
feel free to email us [email protected]
-
Reduce Printing of Currency Notes and Boost Digital Transactions for Next Generation Reforms
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
A constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India is engaged in hearing many petitions filed against the demonetisation...
-
‘Honeymoon’ That Makes Serious Reading
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Don’t judge a book by its cover. Sometimes the cover of a book can be deceptive. Normally the title...
-
Parliament and Assembly Elections must be held Simultaneously
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Frequent elections have made the manifestos redundant. They have now become an exercise in futility, although they were never...
-
Live-Streaming is the Best Substitute To Open Court Hearing
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 2
By Utkarsh Pandey, Advocate The provision of open-court hearing is provided in every democratic justice system in the world....
-
Comical Behaviour of Arvind Kejriwal
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Comical Behaviour of Arvind Kejriwal ‘Absurdity’ has no limits as far as Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal is concerned....
-
O, Christ! Forgive Justice Banumathi for Attributing Her Rise to Only Your Grace
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Justice R Banumathi, who retired today as the Judge of the Supreme Court thanked Jesus Christ more than once...
-
Gutter language of Rita Joshi has shamed all
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
By Parmanand Pandey One would be dumbstruck to hear the language of Ms Rita Bhaguna Joshi, the Chief of...
-
Virtual Courts may not be the Substitute to Physical Courts, but They have Come to Stay
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
The more we get aged, the more diffident we become in adopting the new technology or anything new because...
Categories
Recent Posts
- The conduct of Kejriwal and AAP Leaders is Repulsive and Lowest of the Low
- Comical Behaviour of Arvind Kejriwal
- Karpoori Thakur Fired with Casteism than Idealism. His Personal Honesty was Above the Board
- One Nation, One Election will save the Money of the Exchequer
- A book on spiritualism worthy to be chewed and digested
Recent Comments
- נערות ליווי on Arun Shouri’s Latest Tome is Worthless Through and Through
- Jeromeuters on Padma Vibhushan to late Radhey Shyam Khemka: A Well-Deserved Tribute to a Saintly Editor
- Robertweple2145 on Digitalisation of Currency will Revolutionise the Money Circulation
- Victornem45678 on Live-Streaming is the Best Substitute To Open Court Hearing
- Isacwaync on Kudos to ‘Voice of Lucknow’ and its Editor for Protecting the jobs and Salaries of Journalists
Archives
- April 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- May 2016
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- July 2012
- June 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- June 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- December 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008